My Land Rover blew up so I ordered a Chevy Volt. I shopped every EV & Hybrid out there and after coming to the painful conclusion that I can’t afford a Tesla, I went with the Volt.
It wasn’t the best at anything but overall, it was a great fit. It gets delivered tomorrow.
Print publications will be dead long before Bitcoin.
Just bagged the URL murrayrothschild.tumblr.com
The real Illuminati!
The one thing that makes me truly sad is having all of these ideas in my head yet being too stupid to get them all out.
Today is National Unplug Day, a day wothout technology. And I found that out via the internet…
Sometimes I wonder if “force” is the underlying motive behind everything?
I know we preach the NAP and that “voluntary association” between people who trade goods and services is the key to humanities success.
But then i wonder what keeps everyone honest in that system?
And it’s not just the…
Does the threat of force violate the NAP? If the threat is implicit rather than explicit would that change the possible violation?
Perhaps a better question is how the threat of force is “stored”.
Is it an aggressive implication or a defensive implication.
For example are you saying agree with me or I’ll use force or are you saying that we had an agreement and if you violate it I might use force.
If it’s a defensive threat of force, I can see how that might not violate the NAP.