I tried to tell this British guy I was a libertarian and the first thing he asked was “how will you get a job and drive on roads without a government” and there was no second date.
Talking about private infrastructure and the historical precedent for it got some eyebrow raises from my family in the UK. I totally believe this. The state is integral in British culture.
He tried to argue how great Obamacare was and it took all my strength not to facepalm myself
It’s not even fully nationalized healthcare.
What a fucking dunderhead. You got a thing for bimbos don’t you?
They still worship a “royal” family as if they are the spawn of god. What else did you expect from those limmy statists?
tonight I learned that if you hit cancel on a 1000 word message tumblr just cancels it right away. doesn’t even ask if you’re absolutely sure you want to have just wasted all that fucking time
are you on mobile because it definitely does not do that to me, i get a popup every time i hit cancel or even navigate away from the page. i use Chrome.
I am on firefox, desktop
Chrome always asks if you are sure you want to leave the page.
That’s because Google can read your mind (as well as your emails).
3D print a car from illegal blueprints. Become the first to illegally download a car. Prove them wrong.
Anonymous asked: Do you happen to know why male primates/humans have nipples?
Because females have nipples. And males would look weird with just hair there.
A more science-y explanation is that it’s a developmental holdover. Some people would claim they’re vestigial organs, but it never evolutionarily served any purpose whatsoever (so they’re wrong!). Some people would claim it to be an evolutionary spandrel, which admittedly is a much better guess (so they’re not completely wrong depending on their argument) because it’s not adaptive in any which way for males to have this (surprise! sometimes evolution gives us nonadaptive traits!). But when you look at the biological development, it makes more sense that they’re just developmental holdovers. And that’s because everyone starts off female in utero (yup, females are the default sex). Male nipples developed before sexual differentiation occurs. So which is it, developmental holdover or evolutionary spandrel? It’s always best to abide by Morgan’s Canon that the simplest explanation is the best explanation. And in that regard, developmental holdover wins.
So basically, males have nipples because females have nipples.
From how I’ve always understood it is that if males didn’t have nipples, there’s a chance that they’d pass that trait on to a female offspring and that female wouldn’t have nipples and they’d be unable to feed their children and that would basically cause the end of that genetic mutation.
But like you said, males have nipples because women have nipple, but more so that males have nipples in order to ensure that women have nipples.