theatlantic:

Does the Romney-Ron Paul Pact Make Paul a Sellout?

Ron Paul is helping Mitt Romney. It’s been obvious for months. You’d think Paul’s followers would be outraged by this — but they’re not.
The Paul-Romney alliance means the race’s most ideologically pure fiscal conservative has effectively sold out to the least conservative, least consistent, most establishmentarian candidate in the field. Romney favors the basic concept of progressive taxation and a government’s right to compel citizens to purchase health insurance. It’s unthinkable that he would, if elected, end the Federal Reserve. Alone among the candidates, he insists that there be no cuts to any military spending. All these stances are anathema to Paul’s staunchly absolutist world view.
On paper, you would think Romney would be the chief subject of attacks from the Paul campaign, which has, in its television ads, been more unapologetically negative than any other. Paul has runone ad that slams all three of his rivals — Newt Gingrich (“serial hypocrite”), Rick Santorum (“counterfeit conservative”) and Romney (“flip-flopper). But that’s nothing compared to the attacks he’s unleashed pointed solely at Santorum (“fake,” “a record of betrayal”) and Gingrich (“selling access”).
Romney is the major only candidate Paul hasn’t singled out in an ad. And Paul’s ads against his competitors have been far more brutal than anything Romney or his super PAC have put on the airwaves. In crucial stages of the GOP primary thus far, he’s put hundreds of thousands of dollars behind these ads, helping squelch Santorum and Gingrich when they posed the most danger to Romney’s candidacy.
Helping Romney in his quest to make potential alternative candidates unpalatable to the conservative base is a major assist. But it’s far from the only way Paul has boosted the man who ought to be his biggest nemesis — the embodiment of the sort of soft, big-government Republicanism Paul says it’s his mission to eliminate.
Read more. [Image: Joe Raedle/Getty]


Ron Paul has only run one ad? Ok, then what are these: 
http://youtu.be/B7RaYbToq7Q
http://youtu.be/ExwqY7Wiiig
The truth of the matter is that Ron Paul doesn’t run many attack ads. And if they are, it would be wise not to target Mitt’s campaign from the start seeing as how they have seemingly unlimited funds and can crush the opposition. Politics is a game of timing and strategy. Sometimes you need to avoid opponents instead of attacking them.
I just find it funny that both the left and the right have nothing left to attack Ron Paul with so they are going with the “he’s playing nice, HE’S A SELL OUT!” route.
 @Suga_Shane

theatlantic:

Does the Romney-Ron Paul Pact Make Paul a Sellout?

Ron Paul is helping Mitt Romney. It’s been obvious for months. You’d think Paul’s followers would be outraged by this — but they’re not.

The Paul-Romney alliance means the race’s most ideologically pure fiscal conservative has effectively sold out to the least conservative, least consistent, most establishmentarian candidate in the field. Romney favors the basic concept of progressive taxation and a government’s right to compel citizens to purchase health insurance. It’s unthinkable that he would, if elected, end the Federal Reserve. Alone among the candidates, he insists that there be no cuts to any military spending. All these stances are anathema to Paul’s staunchly absolutist world view.

On paper, you would think Romney would be the chief subject of attacks from the Paul campaign, which has, in its television ads, been more unapologetically negative than any other. Paul has runone ad that slams all three of his rivals — Newt Gingrich (“serial hypocrite”), Rick Santorum (“counterfeit conservative”) and Romney (“flip-flopper). But that’s nothing compared to the attacks he’s unleashed pointed solely at Santorum (“fake,” “a record of betrayal”) and Gingrich (“selling access”).

Romney is the major only candidate Paul hasn’t singled out in an ad. And Paul’s ads against his competitors have been far more brutal than anything Romney or his super PAC have put on the airwaves. In crucial stages of the GOP primary thus far, he’s put hundreds of thousands of dollars behind these ads, helping squelch Santorum and Gingrich when they posed the most danger to Romney’s candidacy.

Helping Romney in his quest to make potential alternative candidates unpalatable to the conservative base is a major assist. But it’s far from the only way Paul has boosted the man who ought to be his biggest nemesis — the embodiment of the sort of soft, big-government Republicanism Paul says it’s his mission to eliminate.

Read more. [Image: Joe Raedle/Getty]

Ron Paul has only run one ad? Ok, then what are these: 

http://youtu.be/B7RaYbToq7Q

http://youtu.be/ExwqY7Wiiig

The truth of the matter is that Ron Paul doesn’t run many attack ads. And if they are, it would be wise not to target Mitt’s campaign from the start seeing as how they have seemingly unlimited funds and can crush the opposition. 

Politics is a game of timing and strategy. Sometimes you need to avoid opponents instead of attacking them.

I just find it funny that both the left and the right have nothing left to attack Ron Paul with so they are going with the “he’s playing nice, HE’S A SELL OUT!” route.

 @Suga_Shane

(via thenewrepublic)

  1. jennifer45 reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. inbonobo reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Paul might think that’s how he might win the ticket. Who am I to second-guess him? Besides, I abandoned him ever since...
  3. pr3pare41mp4ct reblogged this from ghost-of-algren
  4. ghost-of-algren reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. doctoroctothorp reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  6. total-todd-review reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. jjarichardson reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  8. sugashane reblogged this from thenewrepublic and added:
    Ron Paul has only run one ad? Ok, then what are these: http://youtu.be/B7RaYbToq7Q //youtu.be/ExwqY7Wiiig The truth of...
  9. dmbliss reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. thenewrepublic reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. dominamori reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. akiraly reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    But Paul has a simple explanation for his behavior, and it should appall his ideological followers just as much as a...
  13. gourmetdogtreat reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. ahngdawn reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. fulbright reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. johnnybrainwash reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Versions of this have been making the rounds for a week or two, but it’s wildly overblown. Take it as a chance to learn...
  17. dog-tracking reblogged this from theatlantic
  18. esc0 reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Don’t really know what to think about this. I may not like Ron...but I don’t think he...
  19. jcsnyc reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. okaycheckitout reblogged this from theatlantic
  21. primus-capio said: Right, Ron Paul is a sellout. His career clearly illustrates that. Oh wait. Maybe he’s just a pragmatist?
  22. nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Typical Republican hypocrisy.
  23. pieceinthepuzzlehumanity reblogged this from theatlantic
  24. theatlantic posted this
Short URL for this post: http://tmblr.co/ZQLZWyHJ1VnO
blog comments powered by Disqus