lalibertarienne:

conservativetildeath:

If they don’t want that shit why would we?!?!?!

Well, they do have the Federal Employee Program, which is essentially the same thing. Not condoning it, just putting into perspective.

If I were the owner of this van, I’d feel dumb as hell. Why? Because there is nothing exempting the President or Congress on page 114, line 22. 
I’ve gone through a large portion of the ACA and I’ve certainly read all the exemption sections (did you know the word ‘exemption’ is in the ACA 42 times?). 
The words “Obama” “Michelle” and the word “Vice President” aren’t in the document. Congress is in there, 252 times. 
There are 1,000 different ways you can make a legitimate argument against the ACA/Obamacare but this is the one you went with? A made up reason that you didn’t even factcheck before you painted it on your van?
Brilliant. 
This is why no one takes the naysayers seriously. Because so many of us will regurgitate anything we hear. 
Here’s two PDF copies, you guys can check for yourselves:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf
and here:
http://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf

lalibertarienne:

conservativetildeath:

If they don’t want that shit why would we?!?!?!

Well, they do have the Federal Employee Program, which is essentially the same thing. Not condoning it, just putting into perspective.

If I were the owner of this van, I’d feel dumb as hell. Why? Because there is nothing exempting the President or Congress on page 114, line 22. 

I’ve gone through a large portion of the ACA and I’ve certainly read all the exemption sections (did you know the word ‘exemption’ is in the ACA 42 times?). 

The words “Obama” “Michelle” and the word “Vice President” aren’t in the document. Congress is in there, 252 times. 

There are 1,000 different ways you can make a legitimate argument against the ACA/Obamacare but this is the one you went with? A made up reason that you didn’t even factcheck before you painted it on your van?

Brilliant. 

This is why no one takes the naysayers seriously. Because so many of us will regurgitate anything we hear. 

Here’s two PDF copies, you guys can check for yourselves:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf

and here:

http://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf

  1. jerrytokes reblogged this from sharimonsta
  2. car0lune reblogged this from conservatives-on-tumbl3r
  3. sharimonsta reblogged this from conservatives-on-tumbl3r
  4. supadupagsxr reblogged this from conservatives-on-tumbl3r
  5. perspicasity reblogged this from conservatives-on-tumbl3r
  6. conservatives-on-tumbl3r reblogged this from socopolitics
  7. socopolitics reblogged this from animegifsandpics
  8. putonyourpartyhat reblogged this from paxamericana
  9. fullloflife reblogged this from airforcetwo
  10. untameableasthesea reblogged this from pretty-littleladyx
  11. washingtonwildwoman reblogged this from airforcetwo
  12. airforcetwo reblogged this from marilyhearts
  13. hopesuphighh reblogged this from keepyourchangee
  14. marilyhearts reblogged this from keepyourchangee
  15. novice-thin reblogged this from liberals-are-so-strange
  16. keepyourchangee reblogged this from liberals-are-so-strange
  17. moriahinamerica reblogged this from liberals-are-so-strange
  18. liberals-are-so-strange reblogged this from pretty-littleladyx
  19. dayafterdaytilthedaysgoby reblogged this from mareepcuddles
  20. ahandsomestark reblogged this from paxamericana
  21. countryycutiex0x0 reblogged this from blueeyesandauburnhairrr
  22. blueeyesandauburnhairrr reblogged this from a-modest-mans-only-rebel-son
  23. tehshizzles reblogged this from scarlett-grace
  24. southerngirl1223 reblogged this from sweetasstrawberrywine
  25. littlemissmegan reblogged this from figz
  26. figz reblogged this from a-modest-mans-only-rebel-son
  27. themokita reblogged this from a-modest-mans-only-rebel-son
Short URL for this post: http://tmblr.co/ZQLZWyXBWNcq
blog comments powered by Disqus