The group that is always arguing for ”trickle down” economics are the Democrats/Liberals.
The argue that if we gave more money to a minority group (the government) that they will properly redistribute the money down to all the people and we will all prosper.
Why do we just assume that California is a Democrat state?
I always found it weird that everyone just assumes that California is a Democrat state.
We JUST had a Republican governor. In fact, we’ve had many republican governors run California.
California has put three men in the white house (Hoover, Nixon, Reagan) and all three were Republican and that came over the span of almost 60 years.
We have one of the largest if not the largest population of libertarians.
We also have huge gun culture in California. It’s shockingly big. California is one of the top four in number of background checks for gun purchases per year. Our per capita gun ownership is estimated at about 22% (which I think is way underestimated), but we’re one of the most populated states out there with 38 million people living here. That means the 22% actually translates to 8.3 million gun owners.
That 8.3 million is so large that if it became it’s own state, it would be the 12th largest in terms of population. We have more gun owners in California that 39 other states have in terms of residents. Think about that.
With all of these numbers in mind, I don’t understand how we can’t overturn so of these asinine laws that prevent us from owning certain types of guns and accessories and how we’ve failed to block so many of these baseless new laws from passing.
Do we lack proper organization and leadership? Is the NRA failing or is it to large of a system for them to support? Is the GOofA too small? What’s up, Cali? How do we fix this?
In the House, they have to because the Democrats don’t have the majority. In the Senate, I’m happy not to filibuster it, and I will announce tonight on your show that I will work with Harry Reid to let him pass his big old tax hike with a simple majority if that’s what Harry Reid wants, because then they will become the party of high taxes and they can own it. —
Rand, he’s up and down for me. Still, I guess better him than any number of potential republican senators.
I don’t think positively of this “method”. Sit back and let them ruin it?
I was just saying this last night.
SS: I don’t care about ‘playing politics’ but I’m always down with the ‘let it fucking burn’ option, here’s why:
Americans just don’t understand how fucked we are in regards to fiscal and monetary policies. They think that one side or the other has the perfect plan and that the opposite side is fucking things up. In reality, they are all fucking things up but you can’t convince them of that right now. You can only do that with a clean slate and a clean slate doesn’t come unless there is so kind of financial chaos. That’s the mother of all change.
So if you truly want real economic change to come to America, you shouldn’t fear the impeding chaos. Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama and his yes-men aren’t banking on the chaos to push their own type of change. These guys keep upping the ante on the GOP as if they don’t actually want a deal.
Obama had requested $800 billion in revenues a few months ago and the GOP sucked it up and showed up with that exact figure. Obama and his trolls went ahead and shot that down and doubled-down on their request, now asking for tax hikes on the top 2% as opposed to the top 1% and asking for a total of $1.6 TRILLION, twice what Obama requested just a few months ago.
Obama is routing for chaos and I’m on board. It’s going to take chaos to motivate the American public to wake the fuck up and fix this mess because we all know there’s no real change that’s going to come from Washington.
Oh, by the way, none of this made-up Taxmageddon bullshit is even real. We can just let the tax cuts continue, freeze the spending increases and boom, everything is fine. But both sides, especially the Dems, wanted this mess to come to a head so they can leverage it to vilify the, now, 2% and get all of the 98%, including Republicans who oppose tax increases, to turn on their own principles and choose their own financial stability over their ideology.
Obama and his team are a lot of brilliant politicians. These guys have mastered the game better than anyone I’ve ever seen hold public office. They know exactly how to spin things, how to divide factions and how to get what they want without actually asking for it.
Obama is in it for the chaos. If he wasn’t he’d just extend the tax cuts and hold the spending increases.
The real issues are the unfunded liabilities and what we’re going to do when we actually run out of ways to pay the notes that we’ve already promised and we’re left with two options: default or inflate.
So yes, I’m all in on the ‘let it fucking burn’ option because there is no other option left.