The Dow Jones: The bigger they are, the harder they burst. 

thinksquad:

Well that’s a big scary chart. Zerohedge pulled numbers on the biggest 25 banks in and it’s anything but reassuring:
With 9.283 Trillion in depositor funds, it would take only a .002% net shortfall in the banking system to completely exhaust the fund. Let’s assume the banks want to donate 10 years worth of contribution to the fund all at once, right now. That 145 billion would cover a 0.015% devaluation
So far we’ve only talked about the tiny blue bar and the little green bar. The big red bar is another animal entirely, and it’s time we addressed him.
In theory, funds deposited with a broker or in a bank are still your money. In practice, this is not really the case.
Both Knight Capital and MF Global have been caught with their hands in the customer cookie jar after they grabbed whatever funds they could to keep operating for just another day. In the case of MF Global it was a large burst right at the end, but at Knight Capital this was a systemic practice for years.
The problem, as Karl Denninger likes to say, is excessive leverage. In a low interest environment where bailouts are the norm for the largest institutions, there really is no reason to not bet big because if the screw-up is large enough, there’s always rescue waiting.
That scary red bar is the collected debts of those 25 largest banks, and it totals almost 300 trillion dollars, or about 32x total deposits.
I think the chart and numbers say it better than I ever could.
http://EndtheLie.com/2013/03/19/ensuring-bad-outcomes-what-cyprus-tells-us-about-the-world/#ixzz2O7UgIF9A

People still have no idea about this. Zero. 

thinksquad:

Well that’s a big scary chart. Zerohedge pulled numbers on the biggest 25 banks in and it’s anything but reassuring:

With 9.283 Trillion in depositor funds, it would take only a .002% net shortfall in the banking system to completely exhaust the fund. Let’s assume the banks want to donate 10 years worth of contribution to the fund all at once, right now. That 145 billion would cover a 0.015% devaluation

So far we’ve only talked about the tiny blue bar and the little green bar. The big red bar is another animal entirely, and it’s time we addressed him.

In theory, funds deposited with a broker or in a bank are still your money. In practice, this is not really the case.

Both Knight Capital and MF Global have been caught with their hands in the customer cookie jar after they grabbed whatever funds they could to keep operating for just another day. In the case of MF Global it was a large burst right at the end, but at Knight Capital this was a systemic practice for years.

The problem, as Karl Denninger likes to say, is excessive leverage. In a low interest environment where bailouts are the norm for the largest institutions, there really is no reason to not bet big because if the screw-up is large enough, there’s always rescue waiting.

That scary red bar is the collected debts of those 25 largest banks, and it totals almost 300 trillion dollars, or about 32x total deposits.

I think the chart and numbers say it better than I ever could.

http://EndtheLie.com/2013/03/19/ensuring-bad-outcomes-what-cyprus-tells-us-about-the-world/#ixzz2O7UgIF9A

People still have no idea about this. Zero. 

97% Owned - Economic Truth documentary

Want to understand how central banking works? How money is created? How banks manipulate the money supply and inflation? How you’re being lied to? It’s 2 hours long but it’s well worth the watch. 

EDIT: Just wanted to clarify, there’s a lot of “nationalization” and “regulation” talk in this video that I don’t agree with. In fact, I’m not sure I agree with any of the ideas on how to fix the system presented in this video. I am, however, intrigued by the idea one gentlemen in the video had about basing or backing a new currency by energy or energy production, like KWh or something. I think that’s kind of the idea behind bitcoin, not exactly, but close enough. I’d love to read more or explore more on this topic. 

When you print money, the money does not flow evenly into the economic system. It stays essentially in the financial service industry and among people that have access to these funds, mostly well-to-do people. It does not go to the worker. I just mentioned that it doesn’t flow evenly into the system.

Now from time to time it will lift the NASDAQ like between 1997 and March 2000. Then it lifted home prices in the U.S. until 2007. Then it lifted the commodity prices in 2008 until July 2008 when the global economy was already in recession. More recently it has lifted selected emerging economies, stock markets in Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, up four times from 2009 lows and now the U.S.

So we are creating bubbles and bubbles and bubbles. This bubble will come to an end. My concern is that we are going to have a systemic crisis where it is going to be very difficult to hide. Even in gold, it will be difficult to hide.
Marc Faber AKA Dr. Doom (via antigovernmentextremist)

(via antigovernmentextremist)

Peter Schiff, a CIA agent, and a couple of fund managers debate about the health and insolvency of US banks. 

I think Peter brings up a very important point that almost all people with a bank account forget: they are the creditors of banks. 

Yes, when you put money into a bank, you are a depositor, but when that money is used as an asset and loaned out by the bank, you instantly become a creditor and the FDIC only insures so much of your deposit. The FDIC also doesn’t have enough money to cover everyone’s losses, because just like fractional banking, insurance relies on only having to pay out a tiny portion of their guarantees. 

Technically, if a complete collapse of the banking system took place, every single depositor would become an unsecured creditor with nothing to show for their deposits. Because the only leverage we receive when we deposit money is the FDIC insurance. Other than that, we are operating on good faith that the bank will remain solvent, not lose our money and return it on demand. 

The reality is that banks leverage our money and they themselves get some sort of security against the loans they make but that security or leverage is not transferable to depositors. We are simply allowing them to use our assets/money in return for “secured vault storage” and, if lucky, a tiny return on investment.  

Banks can come after your assets if you fail to repay their loans but you cannot do the same. Not to the banks that loaned your money and not to the borrowers who took out the unpaid loans. You’re S.O.L. 

The good news is that there are alternatives and people are finally seeking them out and moving their assets. 

moralanarchism:

People Who Own Treasuries are Going to Lose a Lot of Money-Peter Schiff


Schiff thinks the real reason why the federal government is suing the S&P rating agency is because it downgraded U.S. Treasuries last year. Schiff says, “The reason why they’re being sued is not only because of what they did but to send a message to the other ratings agencies that you better not downgrade U.S. Treasuries.” Schiff predicts, “People who own Treasuries are going to lose a lot of money.” Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Precious Metals.

Coincidentally, I just adjusted my mom’s investment portfolio last night and I dumped 85% of all her treasury holdings. 

I’ve done really well for her so far and I hope I made the right call. I also suggest that others move out of treasury holdings and find their way into whatever investment they can which focuses on precious metals, multinational corps that focus on emergent markets or foreign corps that do the same and perhaps even agriculture.

Disclosure: I personally have zero investments outside options and preferred shares in the firms I work for/with and some physical gold and silver. I stopped trading in 2007 and I liquidated all holdings in November of 2007. I got out at the perfect time, not that I was a genius or an oracle, because I felt uncomfortable by the growth rate of the market. Thankfully, I’m not a greedy weasel. 

libertycrier:

Billionaires Dumping Stocks, Economist Knows Why - http://bit.ly/YRIIU2

All of this happened in August of 2012. That’s 6 months ago, or ancient history in terms of Wall Street. 
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/08/09/warren-buffett-dumps-consumer-stocks/
http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2012/08/14/george-soros-facebook/
If you want to be taken seriously then perhaps you should double check your sources and not post some misleading information…

libertycrier:

Billionaires Dumping Stocks, Economist Knows Why - http://bit.ly/YRIIU2

All of this happened in August of 2012. That’s 6 months ago, or ancient history in terms of Wall Street. 

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/08/09/warren-buffett-dumps-consumer-stocks/

http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2012/08/14/george-soros-facebook/

If you want to be taken seriously then perhaps you should double check your sources and not post some misleading information…

Slate asked readers to draw their own Trillion Dollar Coin designs. These are all winners. 

I personally like the Elephant standing on the Washington Monument.

- Sha

dwangelo:

Episode 4 is up!! Go get it!

Working in “Hollywood” I can tell you that celebs expense EVERYTHING.