I watched like 37 seconds of Boehner’s speech and i had to turn C-SPAN off. I almost puked into my own eyes. 

A Thank You To Ron Paul.

Thanks for trying to chip away at the system from the inside. You’ve had to spend the majority of the last 30 years cooped up with the scum of the scum. Thankfully, rubbing elbows with disease riddled vermin has left you unplagued by their illness for more power, more money, more control, more, more, more.

Yet you’ve remained steadfast and vigilant. Widespread freedom has trumped concentrated power, at least in your mind. You’ve been the bullhorn of liberty, even when the screams of oppression drowned out your song, you remained hopeful, cheerful and, most importantly, confident.

If there’s one thing we can all learn from your example, it’s principles. Many times over you’ve had the chance to bend, to twist your own rules under the guise of “playing the game of politics”, yet you remained strong, dug down and braced yourself for the darkside of politics. Even when the darkness became so over bearing that it dwindled the light of liberty down to a single lit wick, you remained the guardian of that flame, knowing that more believers would eventually return. If it wasn’t for your unwavering character, the liberty movement might have died a 1,000 deaths in my lifetime alone. 

Liberty exists outside of your existence or mine. As you’ve said many times, you’re just the torch bearer. If you disappeared tomorrow, liberty would still exist. You didn’t introduce me to liberty or freedom or even to the principles of being a libertarian, but you showed me it’s potential. You’ve walked the path that’s worth praise, something I rarely dole to any individual. I don’t believe in idols but I do believe in the ideal, and you sir fulfilled that role better than most. 

I can’t personally thank you, but I can continue in your footsteps, not afraid to speak up, not embarrassed to do the right thing, not to proud to admit when I am wrong and never to shy to promote liberty and freedom for all, regardless of race, age, color, physical or mental stature. We shall all do our best to spread the message of liberty and to help fan the flames of liberty, even if only within ourselves, which you re-sparked. 

I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence.” - Ayrton Senna

Thank you, 

Humanity. 

Justin Amash updates everyone on everything he votes along with the explanation and reasoning on via his Facebook account. Even if you don’t support him or his cause or government on the whole, you have to appreciate the level of transparency and honesty. 
Gives me a little bit of hope. 

Justin Amash updates everyone on everything he votes along with the explanation and reasoning on via his Facebook account. Even if you don’t support him or his cause or government on the whole, you have to appreciate the level of transparency and honesty. 

Gives me a little bit of hope. 

Justin Amash, hero. 

Justin Amash, hero. 

nerdylibertarian:

One of the reasons I like Amash…calls people out on their shit.

He’s supposed to be “the next Ron Paul” but I think he’s a tiny bit louder. Which might end up being a great thing. 

nerdylibertarian:

One of the reasons I like Amash…calls people out on their shit.

He’s supposed to be “the next Ron Paul” but I think he’s a tiny bit louder. Which might end up being a great thing. 

(via byulibertarian)

Fools on The Hill.

We just want politicians to read the laws that they pass. Simple, right?

Within a month of 9/11, our Congress passed the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, one of the most controversial and unconstitutional pieces of legislation we’ve seen in our 200+ years of existence. A knee-jerk reaction to an uncontrollable and tragic event. 

The 342 page document was voted on and passed within a month and a half of the event. This includes drafting, reading, debating and voting on the act. 

Congressman Jim McDermott alleged that NO SENATOR READ THE BILL and John Conyers, Jr. responded by saying “We don’t read most of the bills. Do you really know what that would entail if we read every bill that we passed?”

Would that entail that you’re actually doing your JOB, Mr. Conyers? Heaven forbid we forced you to do the job that we elected you to do, that would be a travesty! 

The fact remains that most members of Congress, both House and Senate, rarely read and understand the very same laws they vote on in their entirety. Some of these same members of Congress sometimes skip out on voting all together, as if the six figure income, secret service protection, provided housing, pension plan, travel expenses, living accommodation, full staff, full healthcare plans and countless perks of being an elected official aren’t worth the time it takes to read, understand and vote on the laws and future of this nation. 

These are the fools that we elect every term and this is the foolishness that’s ruining this country. 

@Suga_Shane

EDIT: 

A read sent me a comment, chimming in on the little-known origins of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act. Here’s what he had to say: 

Shane, you stated: ”Within a month of 9/11, our Congress passed the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, one of the most controversial and unconstitutional pieces of legislation we’ve seen in our 200+ years of existence. A knee-jerk reaction to an uncontrollable and tragic event.

The 342 page document was voted on and passed within a month and a half of the event. This includes drafting, reading, debating and voting on the act.

This statement which you made, and the vast majority of Americans truly do believe, is actually false.

The PATRIOT Act was previously introduced as the Omnibus Counter-terrorism Act of 1995 by Senator Joe Biden as S390. Like the PATRIOT Act, the Omnibus Counter-terrorism Act of 1995 was introduced shortly after the Oklahoma City Bombing -meaning it must have been written even before then. I’ve heard rumors that it was first ready to be introduced in 1993 after the first bombing of the World Trade Center but it failed to acquire co-sponsors to enable it to be introduced; if this is true then that would mean that the Bill was written before the WTC bombing of 1993. When it was actually written and by whom is anybody’s guess.

The following are links to the Omnibus Counter-terrorism Act of 1995; these links are to a government website, so if you do not want to go to their website then you can just do a search for it, through Startpage

104th Congress (1995-1996) S.390.IS The IS following S.390 means that it was (I)ntroduced in the (S)enate.

Beginning; as you can see here it was introduced by Senator Joe Biden

Plenty of people(lawmakers and insiders) have read these Bills, that is just a misdirection, because most -if not all- of these Bills have been around for quite some time.

I find it quite interesting to point this out to the partisan individuals whom I meet: in 1995 when this Bill was introduced the majority of Republicans were against it -because it was going to grow government and the government would be spying on us- and then in 2001 as it was introduced as the PATRIOT Act, the Democrats put up a fuss about it, because it was going to allow the government to spy on us; it was, as we all know, just political theater for the dumbed down lethargic sloth-like society who wouldn’t realize the irony that the Dems didn’t mind the government spying on us in 1995, when they introduced the Bill, but they have a problem with it in 2001, and that the Repubs had a problem with government being able to spy on the citizens in 1995 but they didn’t have a problem in 2001 when essentially the same Bill was introduced by a Republican.

This type of action builds the premise that the Republicans vote against Bills because they are Democrat Bills and that Democrats vote against Bills because they are Republican Bills; but this is also false since neither the Democrats nor the Republicans actually wrote/write the Bill(s). The Bills are written by “Think Tanks” which are funded by NWO proponents and conspirators.

‎545 vs. 300,000,000 People - By Charlie ReesePoliticians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does.You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.If the Army & Marines are in Iraqand Afghanistan it’s because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan …If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.There are no insoluble government problems.Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.They, and they alone, have the power.They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!___
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
Well said, Charlie. Well said. 

‎545 vs. 300,000,000 People - By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraqand Afghanistan it’s because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan …

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

___

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

Well said, Charlie. Well said. 

It’s sort of a given that the rich would be the one’s largely encompassing Congress. Why are we shocked that the elected have gobs of money when we all know it takes  gobs of money to get elected. 
Having billionaires and millionaires isn’t necessarily the issue that plagues our country. While these members of Congress might be more inclined to look out for the needs of themselves and their own inner circles, they usually are balanced by the fear of losing the trust of those below them, the very same people that elect them. 
The issue isn’t the wealth of those in power. The issue is the wealth of those empowering those in power. Those that donate to their charities and to their campaigns. The lobbyists and the SPACs and the non-profits that accumulate and hoard large sums of cash for the sole purpose of funding and swaying entire elections to benefit their Fortune 500 companies. To line the custom tailored silk pockets of themselves and their financial planners, accountants, lawyers and advisers. To find every way to cheap the system out of every last nickle and dime. The very same system that helped them build their empires. 
Don’t fear the money in Congress. That money is useless. It sits in their bank accounts, monitored and talked about by the public, yet causes no harm. Be fearful of the money that fund the money. The money that delivers us our “candidates”, wins them our votes, and keeps them in office until they decide that we are sick of them. 
Don’t show me a chart of what Congress is worth. Show me a chart of what their backers, supporters and campaign contributors are worth. It’s the money behind the money I worry about because therein lies the real problem. 
@Suga_Shane
via soupsoup:

Why people hate Congress, in one chart
based on data from Wealth, Income, and Power
Update: The Fix has removed the chart, saying it was misleading “(This post initially used a chart that included data that we and others misunderstood. It did not reflect the wealth of Congress, but instead the wealth of the country, described according to numbers of seats in Congress. The Fix regrets the error.)”  Hat tip to Jessica Binsch for the update.

It’s sort of a given that the rich would be the one’s largely encompassing Congress. Why are we shocked that the elected have gobs of money when we all know it takes  gobs of money to get elected. 

Having billionaires and millionaires isn’t necessarily the issue that plagues our country. While these members of Congress might be more inclined to look out for the needs of themselves and their own inner circles, they usually are balanced by the fear of losing the trust of those below them, the very same people that elect them. 

The issue isn’t the wealth of those in power. The issue is the wealth of those empowering those in power. Those that donate to their charities and to their campaigns. The lobbyists and the SPACs and the non-profits that accumulate and hoard large sums of cash for the sole purpose of funding and swaying entire elections to benefit their Fortune 500 companies. To line the custom tailored silk pockets of themselves and their financial planners, accountants, lawyers and advisers. To find every way to cheap the system out of every last nickle and dime. The very same system that helped them build their empires. 

Don’t fear the money in Congress. That money is useless. It sits in their bank accounts, monitored and talked about by the public, yet causes no harm. Be fearful of the money that fund the money. The money that delivers us our “candidates”, wins them our votes, and keeps them in office until they decide that we are sick of them. 

Don’t show me a chart of what Congress is worth. Show me a chart of what their backers, supporters and campaign contributors are worth. It’s the money behind the money I worry about because therein lies the real problem. 

@Suga_Shane

via soupsoup:

Why people hate Congress, in one chart

based on data from Wealth, Income, and Power

Update: The Fix has removed the chart, saying it was misleading “(This post initially used a chart that included data that we and others misunderstood. It did not reflect the wealth of Congress, but instead the wealth of the country, described according to numbers of seats in Congress. The Fix regrets the error.)” Hat tip to Jessica Binsch for the update.