How is this a valid argument?
How is it an argument to say that X is false because X’s standards have not been fulfilled by proponents of X?
And why is libertarianism a “cognitive disorder” as you tagged this post as?
If the idea of Peace is so great, why hasn’t humanity ever had world-wide Peace?
Clearly Peace is not a great idea, we should live in a society based on unending wars and violence.
I seriously doubt whether half of the anarcho-capitalists I know have ever read Rothbard or Mises.
Because… they generally are just repeating “conversation” libertarianism. Like stuff that libertarians say on Facebook and Tumblr.
…and usually don’t understand the actual theory when we start talking.
What you are essentially saying is that people who aren’t Rothbard or Mises (who wasn’t an AnCap) can’t independently conceive the idea of anarchy or Anarcho-capitalism?
The beauty of anarchism or Anarcho-Capitalism is that it is very logical. One can easily deduce the theories and ideas of anarchism single handedly, without ever having to be introduced to the great thinkers of libertarianism.
Anarchy is logic.